Bill mac fence ny software#
Bill mac fence ny Pc#

Thus, Apple must open the Macintosh architecture to have the independent support required to gain momentum and establish a standard. The industry has reached the point where it is now impossible for Apple to create a standard out of their innovative technology without support from, and the resulting credibility of other personal computer manufacturers. The ratio becomes even greater when the manufacturers of expansion cards are included.ДЄs the independent investment in a вЂњstandardвЂќ architecture grows, so does the momentum for that architecture. The IBM architecture, when compared to the Macintosh, probably has more than 100 times the engineering resources applied to it when investment of compatible manufacturers is included. The closed architecture prevents similar independent investment in the Macintosh. the Compaq portable, or the faster DeskPro). manufacture of differentiated compatibles (e.g.the high resolution Hercules graphics card for monochrome monitors) expansion cards made possible because of access to the bus (e.g.Hardware deficiencies are remedied in two ways:

Bill mac fence ny software#

(Though clearly the independent investment in the Apple II, and the resulting momentum, is another great example.) The investment in the IBM architecture includes development of differentiated compatibles, software and peripherals user and sales channel education and most importantly, attitudes and perceptions that are not easily changed.ДЄny deficiencies in the IBM architecture are quickly eliminated by independent support.

Bill mac fence ny Pc#

Specifically, the IBM PC architecture continues to receive huge investment and gains additional momentum. The significant investment (especially independent support) in a вЂњstandard personal computerвЂќ results in an incredible momentum for its architecture. Even though Apple realized this, they have not been able to gain the independent support required to be perceived as a standard. But no personal computer company, not even IBM, can create a standard without independent support. They must establish a вЂњrevolutionaryвЂќ architecture, which necessarily implies new development incompatible with existing architectures.ДЄpple must make Macintosh a standard. This position implies that Apple must create a standard on new, advanced technology. Apple may not have вЂњmarket dominanceвЂќ but they make by orders of magnitude the most profit: who cares about anything else?ДЄppleвЂ™s stated position in personal computers is innovative technology leader. ThatвЂ™s not something that is possible when youвЂ™re licensing out your operating system to every manufacturer coming along, which is exactly the problem that Microsoft and Google are now having, trying to compete with the Mac on the desktop and iOS in mobile. ItвЂ™s not necessarily obvious from the outside, but Apple has always been about the fricttionless fusion of technology and software, hardware and design.

Sure, different, but probably not better.